You know you want:

I haven’t made much use of it yet, but the song search engine Fizy looks promising as a step toward the future replacement of personal music collections – kind of like Pandora did a few years ago (though more for radio than for racks of CDs). It won’t be too long – may have already happened – before someone mashes Fizy up with a playlist generator and voila – no need for that MP3 collection taking up so much virtual space. Well, as long as you have some kind of Web access…
I like last.fm, too, and use it quite a bit, but it seems much more beholden to the music industry than I would like. Still, it lets me share tracks easily, and that’s something. Be sure to check out that one, and esp. the comments – and yes, this whole post was basically just an excuse to post that link.
…so why haven’t we dated?*
Seriously, check out her blog at least once, if only to marvel as this bona fide celebrity person connects her keyboard to the hamster wheel in her brain and delivers nuggets like this:
I”m pleased to report that I’ve managed to brush most of the ick away from this bummer, ball sack area of my existence at least intermittently entitled PRESSING ISSUES, and once again am in the happy position to invite you to assemble with me here in this moonlit, internet arena where I can share the ordinary aspects of the extraordinary world I inhabit!
Whew! I can’t be bothered to find the page, but she did once refer to an extra in Return of the Jedi being permitted, thanks to her ridiculous, Lucas-approved, plastic-thonged slave costume, to “see all the way to Florida,” for which I became a lifetime member of the “OMG, Carrie Fisher!” club.
* Note to all who might take offense: I mean awesome enough to attract my attention, but insane enough to consider dating me.
I’m moving soon – end of next month, most likely – and I needs teh informations, pleez:
Thanks for your attention. Please advise!
I keep telling you that my reading pace has slowed, but get this: I started this book before he died (just over six months ago, grr) and thought I’d just wait ’til I finished the book before I commented on his suicide. Yeah, well, sorry, I’m late to the funeral.
His work affected me and my writing more than any other writer, largely thanks to his style and subtext, rather than any insight into life as it’s lived* or anything merely content-driven. Like all fans of all icons, I suspected that he and I shared congruent perspectives, and I certainly took his permission (too far, no doubt) to make free use of parentheticals and footnotes and conversational elements in my writing. So blame him?
I’ve tried and failed to come up with a predictive taxonomy that could easily split DFW lovers from the haters – writers v. editors, maybe, or readers of McSweeney’s v. Harper’s. Like all problems that don’t matter, it’s a hard one to give up on. I invite your suggestions.
I think it might be better for new readers to start with his non-fiction, maybe this book, though I do know one person so turned off by the title essay that they never looked back. But read his Rolling Stone piece on the 2000 McCain campaign, which became minorly famous last year during the Straight Talk trainwreck and his sweet, sad review of Tracy Austin’s memoir and see what you think. You’ll love him or you won’t, but at least you’ll know.
And I’m out – I guess I’m just not in the mood to rally anyone to discover him. He’s worth it, but I don’t feel right shilling for the poor guy.
* Which is not to say his work is free of insight – far from it. I just mean that his talent for precise dissection of behavior and reasoning in his characters and subjects was less affecting and unique than his open-mindedness about using verbal tools. You know what? Forget it. YMMV.
I have a guilty pleasure! Well, too many to count, really, and “guilty” isn’t exactly appropriate given life’s essential meaninglessness, but I suppose it’s a good shorthand for “something I enjoy reading but am unenthusiastic about explaining to others.” Yet here I am, thanks to my decision to write up every book I finish. Bear with me, this’ll be brief.
James Ellroy darkened noir and maybe turned it into something new. He’s most famous for writing the novel LA Confidential, which got made into a big Hollywood smash a while back. In his world, everyone is approximately equally corrupt, but his heroes are typically struck by a momentary inspiration toward kindness or justice that takes several hundred pages to break them or kill them. The books are always enjoyable because – you might see this as a pattern with me – Ellroy never treats his readers as idiots.
Brown’s Requiem, his first novel, elevates misanthropy to pornographic obsession. The plot doesn’t matter (does it?), but here are some keywords: murder, arson, Beethoven, alcoholism, repo men, incest, golf and welfare fraud. Knock yourself out.
This might not be even remotely funny if you haven’t read the book (why haven’t you?), but I thought it was awesome. More importantly, it’s brief:
He insists he’s just a fan, and while I’m inclined to believe him, who can say? Eventually a corp-derived viral video has to work, right?
Whoa:

I’m pretty sure it didn’t dig very deeply into the past to pull those words out. (I adore Bethany, but it’s not like I write about her thatmuch.) (But now if I do it again, her name becomes even more prominent.) Check it out, if you’re so inclined.
A lesson many THC users (nobody I know, settle down) would do well to learn: Just because it’s hilarious, that doesn’t make it right.
(Via AM Cox, who will always be Wonkette to me)
This is all just a way of asking you if you’re Twittering, and if so, if you’ll let me know? I only follow the one friend, and Kate must be feeling weird all stuck in a box by herself with John Hodgman, Stephen Fry and Ana Marie Cox. Good company, I suppose, but I’d rather my friend:celebrity ratio was higher in Twitter, as in all things.
You said it, sister